Sunday, November 29, 2009
Minchat Asher on the din of Mora'at HaMikdash
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Bnei Yisaschar on Marcheshvan: Chanukat Bayit Shlishi
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Know the Kedushat HaSuccah!
Friday, September 25, 2009
Shabbos Shuvah 5770
Friday, September 18, 2009
Rosh HaShanah Drasha: 2 Aspects of the Shofar
We seem to now have before us a machloket Rishonim. From the words of Rabbeinu Tam, the teki’ah is a component of the mitzvah itself, whereas Rambam, like we said, holds it to be a means to perform the mitzvah. This problem by further explaining what exactly Rabbeinu Tam’s understanding of Teki’at Shofar is. According to Rabbeinu Tam’s shitah, the blowing of the shofar is a form of speech which is a tefillah and tza’akah to Hashem. As we say in davening, שומע קול תרועת עמו ישראל ברחמים. If so, that teki’at shofar is a tefillah, a form of speech, then for sure the din of shomei’ah k’oneh applies to it. Conversely, Rambam writes in Hilchot Teshuva (3:4) that the reason for Teki’at Shofar is as if it is telling the slumbering to awake from their sleep and do teshuvah. Of course that definitely means that the mitzvah is in the shmi’ah.
What is the underlying reality here? Rav Shlomo Fischer shlit"a writes, there are two categories within Teki’at Shofar. We see this said explicitly in the Gemara in Rosh HaShanah 16a says:
The mefarshim grapple with the meaning of the these psukim in Parshat Nitzavim, "שורש פורה ראש ולענה", "למען ספות הרוה את הצמאה", and. The pshat is that the whole parshah is coming to remove any מחשבת און, thoughts of sin, which may rise in the heart of any man, woman, family, or shevet, to say that he or she will walk complacently with themselves, not giving too much concern to the miztvot and not come to any damage for it, for Bnei Yisrael will be good and deserving to receive a shefa brachahv’hatzlachah. This thought is comparable to one who waters his fields, and even though between his fields there is one which is watered and he doesn’t have intent to water it, nonetheless, it will still drink from the water going to the other fields. So too, HaKadosh Boruch Hu will not discern those who think and act this way from the rest of Bnei Yisrael for bad. This way of thinking is exactly the “root flourishing with gall and wormwood,” for it will lead a person to commit avodah zarah with no fear. That is why the Torah coming to tell us otherwise; there is hashgacha pratitover each and every individual, even among the water carriers and wood choppers, "מחוטב עציך עד שואב מימיך". Every person is judged on his own and cannot make himself subsidiary to the mass of the tzibbur.
Furthermore, within this notion of individual judgment are two points. Firstly, it serves as tochachah, to instill fear into the heart and penetrate it, for there is the root of this corrupted thought. However, the second aspect is that of showing Hashem’s reign.
In Masechet Berachot we learn that the entire year we say "הא-ל הקדוש" except for the ten days from Rosh HaShanah to Yom Kippur when we say "המלך הקדוש". Rav Fischer points out that this is a little odd. Going from "הא-ל" to "המלך" is like switching to a lesser adjective? Rather, the truth is that "הא-ל" is not so coupled with the idea of us as a nation. Which is not the case by מלך which cannot exist without an עם, as learn "ברב עם הדרת מלך". This why Chazal established for us to say this, in order to remind ourselves that we must show Hashem’s kingship over us as His nation.
Rav Fischer writes that with this we can resolve a seeming dispute between the Gra and the Arizal. According to the Gra, we must have a lot of simcha by Teki’at Shofar, just like a country on the day that they accept a king’s rule and crown him. So too, by blowing the shofar we are making HaKadosh Boruch Hu our King in all of the עולמות, for we are indeed his people. Wheras the Ari HaKadosh writes that one should be doing וודוי by Teki’at Shofar, which is definitely not like what the Gra says. What is the holy truth? There is no argument; the Ari’s statement to say וודיו is for the very same reason. Since we are ממליך Hashem with Teki’at Shofar, we must consider ourselves and our actions at that time. Someone who does not feel the need for this at that moment of hearing the shofar is showing himself to be like a simple animal with no responsibilities and that doesn’t care about its actions. This is mamash a detraction in the kingship of Hashem, for a king is connected to his people, as we mentioned.
Perhaps, as Rosh HaShanah is rapidly approaching, we can try to have more kavanah as we listen to the shofar, the teki'ah d'chova, and realize how much the piercing blast of a ram's horn impacts us and what it should mean to us. Shana Tova u'Metuka, Ketiva v'Chatima Tova, & Shabbat Shalom!
BS"D We Will Do Good
Before blowing the shofar we say: ערוב עבדך לטוב אל יעשקוני זדים.-"Be Your servant's guarantor for good, let not willful sinners exploit me." (Tehillim 119:122))
Friday, September 11, 2009
Nitzavim- Being a Tzibbur
In this week's parsha we have the somewhat well known pasuk "הנסתרות לה' והנגלות לנו ולבנינו"- from here we learn the important concept (look in Rashi/Ramban) of kol yisrael areivin (ערב=guarantor) zeh bazeh. We have a principle of being responsible for other people’s Torah u’mitzvot. And, sure enough, there are halachic ramifications for this. Rashi (ר"ה פ"ג) says that you have a right to be motzi someone else for Kiddush; but how can you have shomeiah k’oneh if you yourself were already yotzei? Because of kol yisrael areivin zeh bazeh. If there are Jews out there that have not heard Kiddush then you are not completely yotzei.
A certain Rosh Yeshiva like to say there as many different unique aspects of Eretz Yisrael: smicha, egla arufa, nevua, plus the special agricultural aspect… That being said we see that something special is going on above and beyond just the soil. There's a reason why areivut could only begin when Bnei Yisrael entered Ereytz Yisrael. We are primarily a tzibbur when in our holy land, Eretz Yisrael. The atmosphere of its kedushah affcets us and is part of who we are as a nation.
This notion of areivim is a major theme in the parshah, and this means that we are not just individuals but a tzibbur. את אשר ישנו פה ואת אשר איננו פה, tzibbur is something which transcends individual people; it is a new unit which is formed as we enter our land. Hashem should help us to make oursleves deserving of returning to our land to once again become a single unit, an unearthly nation in Eretz Yisrael. Sometimes we forget that we are inherently connected to the Jew next to us, and unfortunately that leads to our own undoing when we cannot bring oursleves to act propelry towards them. How can we be called back to our home if we have not made ourselves decent? We are not in galut for no reason. I think it was from a shiur by Rav Yisachar Frand that I heard this mashal on the churban bayit (and it's definitely a little different than the way I heard it); imagine that a young talmid was brought into the Chofetz Chaim's home to stay there. Such an experience was a reality for certain special and fortunate individuals, and its profoundity can certainly be imagined by any who have notion of the Chofetz Chaim's persona. This young man had a wonderful privelage which he cherished immensly. Then one day he walked into the house to find the tzaddik sitting at his table with solemn look on his face. He looked up and said to the young man, "I'm sorry but you cannot stay in my home anymore. Today I heard you speak lashon hara, you must leave." - We detsroyed ourselves with Sinat Chinam, baseless hatred, and were tossed from our home by the one with Whom we shared residence, HaKadosh Boruch Hu. Unless we try to repair that which we we have cracked, to what end to we expect to come? As the Yamim Noraim approach and we are faced with the dread of our judgement's inscription and the yearning for atonement, maybe we should keep this idea in mind.
(What’s the difference between the tochacha in Bechukotai and the one in Ki tavo? Bechukotai is in lashon rabim and Ki tavo is in lashon yachid. The Gra writes that when you have a chovat tzibbur it often is in lashon yachid. - Where do we see an example of this newfound tzibbur aspect taking effect in E”Y? In Sefer Yehoshua by kibush haaretz, everyone suffered because one man, Achan, did an aveira by taking the verboten booty of Yericho.)
Back for a New Year
Friday, May 8, 2009
Emor- "They placed him [by himslef]"
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Chag Kasher v'Sameach
Quick Pesach Thought
Friday, April 3, 2009
Shabbos HaGadol: The Power of Shabbos
Friday, February 27, 2009
Trumah: Internal Value vs External Beauty
After reading the text, it would seem evident from the order of items donated to the Mishkan that they are listed from most valuable (gold, silver, copper) to least valuable (oil, spices). The Or HaChaim HaKadosh asks, that it seems odd then, that very last on the list of contributions are the avnei shoham and avnei miluim. These were precious gems used in the clothing of the Kohen Gadol! Why would the Torah put these valuable and important items last when they should have been first?
The Midrash (Shemot Rabbah 33:8) teaches that beautiful stones and gems fell with the mann to Bnei Yisrael. The Nesiim gathered them and later gave them to the Mishkan (The Maharzu comments that there were only twelve stones in the urim v’tumim so they must have been given by the twelve Nesiim. The two avnei shoham, however, are still in question as to who brought them.). Similarly, the Gemara in Yoma (75a) says that the Ananei HaKavod brought the avnei shoham and the avnei miluim. If this is the case, then that would mean that they were brought without any exertion or chisaron kis; after all, they literally fell from the heavens. Therefore it makes sense that they were listed after those things which were given from by the exertion and expense of the contributor. The Or HaChaim HaKadosh teaches us an amazing thing here; these precious gems, components of the Bigdei Kehuna, may have seemed externally valuable, but lost their intrinsic value when they did not come from a tircha, from an effort.
Rashi on the pasuk, “V’yikchu Li Trumah,” says that trumah is a hafrashah- that Bnei Yisrael should set aside some money as a contribution. R’ Shlomo Yosef Zevin writes that there are three types of separation. Firstly, there is separating without intent to make a distinction of importance. An example of this would be making sure that the letters in a sefer Torah are separate from each other, which is not because one letter is holier and distinct from the other. Secondly, there is separating that which is holier from that which is not as holy. An example of this is Shabbos, which is intrinsically holier and distinct from the rest of the week, and we therefore separate it. The third type of separation is when the act of separation makes the object ditinct and thereby infuses it with kedushah. By trumot and maasrot, before separation the whole thing is tevel. But once part of it separated, it becomes special and is sanctified as trumah. This 3rd type of separation is the category of the contributions Bnei Yisrael gave to the Mishkan. It was through the act of separating that which they gave which made it special and holy. It wasn’t just a matter of taking objects which are already considered nice and beautiful and giving those; but rather the exertion of setting it aside and giving it made it intrinsically holy.
A lesson to take from this can be to realize the difference between a superficial serving of G-d, and a heartfelt, meaningful avodah of HaKadosh Boruch. Upholding the mitzvot is not just about doing the things which come easily. We are required to have some tircha, some ameilut- toil and sweat! Sometimes it can seem so nice and easy to just take out one the gems we have and give it to the Mishkan. But we need to ask ourselves whether that gem came from exertion on our part, or whether we just found it conveniently lying around and simply picked it up in order to give it. The sincerity and effort that go into performing a mitzvah makes all the difference and can easily outweigh the external beauty and value of that which has little intrinsic value.
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Mishpatim: Kabbalat HaTorah & Talmud Torah
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Waking Up: Modeh Ani
I gratefully thank You, O living and eternal King, for You have returned my soul within me with compassion- abudnant is Your faithfulness! (Artscroll Siddur)
Sunday, January 25, 2009
Parshat Va'era
וַיַּעַשׂ יְדֹוָד אֶת הַדָּבָר הַזֶּה מִמָּחֳרָת וַיָּמָת כֹּל מִקְנֵה מִצְרָיִם וּמִמִּקְנֵה בְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל לֹא מֵת אֶחָד: וַיִּשְׁלַח פַּרְעֹה וְהִנֵּה לֹא מֵת מִמִּקְנֵה יִשְׂרָאֵל עַד אֶחָד וַיִּכְבַּד לֵב פַּרְעֹה וְלֹא שִׁלַּח אֶת הָעָם:וארא ט:ו-ז
This can be explained according to the Malbim who writes that when it says here לא מת ממקנה ישראל עד אחד, it is like when the Torah says of the Mitzrim by the Yam Suf, לא נשאר בהם עד אחד. Chazal explain that Paroh alone survived, meaning that this phrase means "up to but not including this one that survived." Similar language is used in Sefer Shoftim by the battle of Devorah, where we know that Sisra did survive. He writes that here by the Makkah of Dever, if we read it properly according to this understanding, one animal from Bnei Yisrael was killed. It was an animal belonging to the son of a Jewish mother and a Mitzri father. According to Jewish law he was considered a Mitzri in regards to his property. However, when Paroh heard of this he considered the man to be Jewish like his mother. Therefore, in his eyes an animal had died from Bnei Yisrael and Moshe's words had not been fulfilled. According to this is we can better understand why Paroh's heart then hardened.